Citibank v. Perz

A newly reported case suggests a need for caution in attempting to negotiate with credit card lender … and the lenders need to be cautious as well. In Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. Perz, 191 Ohio App.3d 575, 2010-Ohio-5890, a lawyer sent a proposed settlement letter to a credit card company with a check for less than the amount due, saying that they should return the check if the offer was not accepted. The company cashed the check and kept on collection. The case reveals three lessons: (1) Credit card agreement these days say they can cash “paid in full” checks but continue to collect if the account is not really paid in full. (Normally, you can’t have an enforceable accord and satisfaction with a “paid in full” check if the account is not in fact paid in full or not disputed in good faith.) (2) Credit card companies may have a hard time proving the terms of the credit card (other than the debt), because of they way they send their term sheets without getting signatures. How do they prove which term sheet any card-holder actually received? (3) A “paid in full’ check might act as a settlement of an undisputed account if the disclosed reason for less-than-full payment is for the debtor to avoid bankruptcy.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: